[netbsd-7] Critical issue with ffs+log

[Martin Husemann]

rld0 contains two disks (wd0 and wd1). Both are clean (smartctl
doesn't return any error) and new.

Can you please provide the full dmesg?

Martin

--
Posted automagically by a mail2news gateway at muc.de e.V.
Please direct questions, flames, donations, etc. to news-***@muc.de

[Thor Lancelot Simon]

Post by Martin Husemann

rld0 contains two disks (wd0 and wd1). Both are clean (smartctl
doesn't return any error) and new.

Can you please provide the full dmesg?
Martin

Of course.

Ugh, ataraid.

If you skip the first 1MB or thereabouts, do the drives have exactly
the same contents?

Thor

--
Posted automagically by a mail2news gateway at muc.de e.V.
Please direct questions, flames, donations, etc. to news-***@muc.de

[Thor Lancelot Simon]

Post by Thor Lancelot Simon
Ugh, ataraid.
If you skip the first 1MB or thereabouts, do the drives have exactly
the same contents?

I suppose you say that ataraid is not usable in production...
I will try to convert ataraid in raidframe configuration as soon as
possible.

I am not advocating that, I'm trying to gather information. Do the
drives actually have the same contents at this point in time, or not?

If they don't, yes, in that case I would suspect a problem with ataraid.

But though it's ugly, ataraid is also comparatively simple, so before
you tear it out, let's see whether it is likely to be at fault or not.

Thor

--
Posted automagically by a mail2news gateway at muc.de e.V.
Please direct questions, flames, donations, etc. to news-***@muc.de