Christian Biere
2006-10-27 23:04:59 UTC
Hi,
KAME has deprecated these non-standard IPv6 socket options several years ago:
IPV6_OPTIONS
IPV6_RECVOPTS
IPV6_RECVRETOPTS
IPV6_RECVDSTADDR
IPV6_RETOPTS
They are still defined in sys/netinet6/in6.h although they are not supported
(anymore). They are commented out in ip6(4). Should these definitions be
removed from in6.h? Due to those, programs might assume these are actually
supported.
$ grep -Erl 'IPV6_(OPTIONS|RECVOPTS|RECVRETOPTS|RECVDSTADDR|RETOPTS)' .
./crypto/dist/ipsec-tools/src/racoon/isakmp.c
./crypto/dist/ipsec-tools/src/racoon/sockmisc.c
./share/man/man4/ip6.4
./sys/netinet6/in6.h
The only maybe-user in NetBSD is this one:
./crypto/dist/ipsec-tools/src/racoon/sockmisc.c
Because it does this:
#if defined(IP_RECVDSTADDR) && !defined(IPV6_RECVDSTADDR)
#define IPV6_RECVDSTADDR IP_RECVDSTADDR
#endif
The first line should probably be changed to this:
#if defined(IP_RECVDSTADDR) && !defined(IPV6_RECVDSTADDR) && !defined(INET6_ADVAPI)
This would prevent potential bugs in case the value of IP_RECVDSTADDR (7) ever matches
another option in the future.
Further, attempts to use the mentioned options fail with ENOPROTOOPT:
42 ENOPROTOOPT Protocol not available. A bad option or level was speci-
fied in a getsockopt(2) or setsockopt(2) call.
Shouldn't this actually be "Protocol option not available."? Especially in
the context of IPv6 claiming the "protocol" itself not being available is
rather confusing. Google shows that only HP-UX has "corrected" this standard
error message by inserting the expected "option". Would anyone mind if I
changed the string?
KAME has deprecated these non-standard IPv6 socket options several years ago:
IPV6_OPTIONS
IPV6_RECVOPTS
IPV6_RECVRETOPTS
IPV6_RECVDSTADDR
IPV6_RETOPTS
They are still defined in sys/netinet6/in6.h although they are not supported
(anymore). They are commented out in ip6(4). Should these definitions be
removed from in6.h? Due to those, programs might assume these are actually
supported.
$ grep -Erl 'IPV6_(OPTIONS|RECVOPTS|RECVRETOPTS|RECVDSTADDR|RETOPTS)' .
./crypto/dist/ipsec-tools/src/racoon/isakmp.c
./crypto/dist/ipsec-tools/src/racoon/sockmisc.c
./share/man/man4/ip6.4
./sys/netinet6/in6.h
The only maybe-user in NetBSD is this one:
./crypto/dist/ipsec-tools/src/racoon/sockmisc.c
Because it does this:
#if defined(IP_RECVDSTADDR) && !defined(IPV6_RECVDSTADDR)
#define IPV6_RECVDSTADDR IP_RECVDSTADDR
#endif
The first line should probably be changed to this:
#if defined(IP_RECVDSTADDR) && !defined(IPV6_RECVDSTADDR) && !defined(INET6_ADVAPI)
This would prevent potential bugs in case the value of IP_RECVDSTADDR (7) ever matches
another option in the future.
Further, attempts to use the mentioned options fail with ENOPROTOOPT:
42 ENOPROTOOPT Protocol not available. A bad option or level was speci-
fied in a getsockopt(2) or setsockopt(2) call.
Shouldn't this actually be "Protocol option not available."? Especially in
the context of IPv6 claiming the "protocol" itself not being available is
rather confusing. Google shows that only HP-UX has "corrected" this standard
error message by inserting the expected "option". Would anyone mind if I
changed the string?
--
Christian
--
Posted automagically by a mail2news gateway at muc.de e.V.
Please direct questions, flames, donations, etc. to news-***@muc.de
Christian
--
Posted automagically by a mail2news gateway at muc.de e.V.
Please direct questions, flames, donations, etc. to news-***@muc.de