Discussion:
ikphy negotiation problem with cisco
(too old to reply)
john heasley
2010-03-31 20:34:52 UTC
Permalink
I have a new board (Supermicro X7DVA-8/X7DVA-E) with a dual interface
as indicated below. The problem is that this interfaces refuses to
auto-negotiate with a cisco 6500 gige port. The only way to get link
is auto-neg on the wm and hard-configured 100m/half duplex.

Does anyone have this mac / phy combination that is working?

This is with a 2009/12/15 kernel. I was going to try a newer kernel, but
with 'no options MODULAR' the new kernel is still trying to load mod_ffs,
which is built-in. but, even with new modules, the machine just resets
after a few second pause after loading the ffs module.

wm0 at pci4 dev 0 function 0: i80003 dual 1000baseT Ethernet, rev. 1
wm0: interrupting at ioapic0 pin 18
wm0: PCI-Express bus
wm0: 65536 word (16 address bits) SPI EEPROM
wm0: Ethernet address 00:30:48:d4:97:28
ikphy0 at wm0 phy 1: i82563 10/100/1000 media interface, rev. 2
ikphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseT, 1000baseT-FDX
, auto
wm1 at pci4 dev 0 function 1: i80003 dual 1000baseT Ethernet, rev. 1
wm1: interrupting at ioapic0 pin 19
wm1: PCI-Express bus
wm1: 65536 word (16 address bits) SPI EEPROM
wm1: Ethernet address 00:30:48:d4:97:29
ikphy1 at wm1 phy 1: i82563 10/100/1000 media interface, rev. 2
ikphy1: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseT, 1000baseT-FDX
, auto


--
Posted automagically by a mail2news gateway at muc.de e.V.
Please direct questions, flames, donations, etc. to news-***@muc.de
Manuel Bouyer
2010-04-01 13:28:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by john heasley
I have a new board (Supermicro X7DVA-8/X7DVA-E) with a dual interface
as indicated below. The problem is that this interfaces refuses to
auto-negotiate with a cisco 6500 gige port. The only way to get link
is auto-neg on the wm and hard-configured 100m/half duplex.
Does anyone have this mac / phy combination that is working?
I have several of this one:
wm0 at pci4 dev 0 function 0: i80003 dual 1000baseT Ethernet, rev. 1
wm0: interrupting at ioapic0 pin 18, event channel 6
wm0: PCI-Express bus
wm0: 65536 word (16 address bits) SPI EEPROM
wm0: Ethernet address 00:30:48:31:43:82
ikphy0 at wm0 phy 1: i82563 10/100/1000 media interface, rev. 2
ikphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseT, 1000baseT-FDX, auto

It negociates properly with a 100baseTX or 1000baseT port of a
cisco 3750 serie switch.
This is with a netbsd-5 kernel, sources around the 17 March
--
Manuel Bouyer <***@antioche.eu.org>
NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--

--
Posted automagically by a mail2news gateway at muc.de e.V.
Please direct questions, flames, donations, etc. to news-***@muc.de
SAITOH Masanobu
2010-04-05 06:03:49 UTC
Permalink
From: Manuel Bouyer <***@antioche.eu.org>
Subject: Re: ikphy negotiation problem with cisco
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 15:28:46 +0200
Post by john heasley
Post by john heasley
I have a new board (Supermicro X7DVA-8/X7DVA-E) with a dual interface
as indicated below. The problem is that this interfaces refuses to
auto-negotiate with a cisco 6500 gige port. The only way to get link
is auto-neg on the wm and hard-configured 100m/half duplex.
Does anyone have this mac / phy combination that is working?
wm0 at pci4 dev 0 function 0: i80003 dual 1000baseT Ethernet, rev. 1
wm0: interrupting at ioapic0 pin 18, event channel 6
wm0: PCI-Express bus
wm0: 65536 word (16 address bits) SPI EEPROM
wm0: Ethernet address 00:30:48:31:43:82
ikphy0 at wm0 phy 1: i82563 10/100/1000 media interface, rev. 2
ikphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseT, 1000baseT-FDX, auto
It negociates properly with a 100baseTX or 1000baseT port of a
cisco 3750 serie switch.
This is with a netbsd-5 kernel, sources around the 17 March
--
NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--
My own box has only one interface and works fine, too.

wm0 at pci4 dev 0 function 0: i80003 dual 1000baseT Ethernet, rev. 1
wm0: interrupting at ioapic0 pin 18
wm0: PCI-Express bus
wm0: 65536 word (16 address bits) SPI EEPROM
wm0: Ethernet address 00:13:d3:c0:3c:7c
ikphy0 at wm0 phy 1: i82563 10/100/1000 media interface, rev. 2
ikphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseT, 1000baseT-FDX, auto

John, do both interface have the problem? Does the problem occurs any switch
and hub?

----------------------------------------------------------
SAITOH Masanobu (***@iij.ad.jp
***@netbsd.org)

--
Posted automagically by a mail2news gateway at muc.de e.V.
Please direct questions, flames, donations, etc. to news-***@muc.de
john heasley
2010-04-06 20:46:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by SAITOH Masanobu
Subject: Re: ikphy negotiation problem with cisco
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 15:28:46 +0200
Post by john heasley
Post by john heasley
I have a new board (Supermicro X7DVA-8/X7DVA-E) with a dual interface
as indicated below. The problem is that this interfaces refuses to
auto-negotiate with a cisco 6500 gige port. The only way to get link
is auto-neg on the wm and hard-configured 100m/half duplex.
Does anyone have this mac / phy combination that is working?
wm0 at pci4 dev 0 function 0: i80003 dual 1000baseT Ethernet, rev. 1
wm0: interrupting at ioapic0 pin 18, event channel 6
wm0: PCI-Express bus
wm0: 65536 word (16 address bits) SPI EEPROM
wm0: Ethernet address 00:30:48:31:43:82
ikphy0 at wm0 phy 1: i82563 10/100/1000 media interface, rev. 2
ikphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseT, 1000baseT-FDX, auto
It negociates properly with a 100baseTX or 1000baseT port of a
cisco 3750 serie switch.
This is with a netbsd-5 kernel, sources around the 17 March
--
NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--
My own box has only one interface and works fine, too.
wm0 at pci4 dev 0 function 0: i80003 dual 1000baseT Ethernet, rev. 1
wm0: interrupting at ioapic0 pin 18
wm0: PCI-Express bus
wm0: 65536 word (16 address bits) SPI EEPROM
wm0: Ethernet address 00:13:d3:c0:3c:7c
ikphy0 at wm0 phy 1: i82563 10/100/1000 media interface, rev. 2
ikphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseT, 1000baseT-FDX, auto
John, do both interface have the problem? Does the problem occurs any switch
and hub?
I do not know; the machine is hundreds of miles away and remote hands are
difficult to arrange. I haven't tried the second interface with this
switch nor tried any other GE switches. When I installed netbsd, it was
connected to a 10/100 cisco. It worked fine, but I do not recall if it
negotiated full-duplex or not.

If I watch the switch and machine closely (repeat the commands), they
seem to agree on 1000/FD, then reset, repeat.

--
Posted automagically by a mail2news gateway at muc.de e.V.
Please direct questions, flames, donations, etc. to news-***@muc.de
Loading...