Discussion:
FAST_IPSEC status (or: why is it in no kernel config file)
(too old to reply)
Hubert Feyrer
2009-02-05 09:32:35 UTC
Permalink
Is FAST_IPSEC considered working? If so, should it be added to a few
kernel config files? It's currently not there as comment...


- Hubert

--
Posted automagically by a mail2news gateway at muc.de e.V.
Please direct questions, flames, donations, etc. to news-***@muc.de
Joerg Sonnenberger
2009-02-05 12:48:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by Hubert Feyrer
Is FAST_IPSEC considered working? If so, should it be added to a few
kernel config files? It's currently not there as comment...
In that past the IPSec options where found to have a measurable impact
when included, even if no IPSec is in use. Has that changed?

Joerg

--
Posted automagically by a mail2news gateway at muc.de e.V.
Please direct questions, flames, donations, etc. to news-***@muc.de
Hubert Feyrer
2009-02-05 15:29:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by Joerg Sonnenberger
Post by Hubert Feyrer
Is FAST_IPSEC considered working? If so, should it be added to a few
kernel config files? It's currently not there as comment...
In that past the IPSec options where found to have a measurable impact
when included, even if no IPSec is in use. Has that changed?
IF it works it should be added to the ALL kernel (for build testing),
and (possibly commented out) in GENERIC kernels.

That's not related to my question, though.


- Hubert

--
Posted automagically by a mail2news gateway at muc.de e.V.
Please direct questions, flames, donations, etc. to news-***@muc.de
Thor Lancelot Simon
2009-02-05 15:31:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by Hubert Feyrer
Post by Joerg Sonnenberger
Post by Hubert Feyrer
Is FAST_IPSEC considered working? If so, should it be added to a few
kernel config files? It's currently not there as comment...
In that past the IPSec options where found to have a measurable impact
when included, even if no IPSec is in use. Has that changed?
IF it works it should be added to the ALL kernel (for build testing),
and (possibly commented out) in GENERIC kernels.
It can't be, because it conflicts with options IPSEC. You can only have
one or the other in ALL.

Thor

--
Posted automagically by a mail2news gateway at muc.de e.V.
Please direct questions, flames, donations, etc. to news-***@muc.de
Loading...